This the drawing I helped Ralph make for the Book: Architectural Inventions(Visionary Drawings) published by Laurence King
Ralph Baker, A blind street photographer sits in Rikers waiting to continue his ongoing quest to hold on to two buildings in Brooklyn. One he holds the quiet title to(140 Metropolitan,Brooklyn), the other(south Eliot st in Fort Greene Brooklyn), a man with the name "Ralph W. Baker Jr" says it is his instead...
Sunday, October 21, 2012
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Current thoughts on Ralph Baker's Situation
I've know Ralph Baker since the time I first moved to the northside of Williamsburg Brooklyn in 1996.
I've been in touch with him off and on all these years and I've always been interested in his different land and real estate ventures.
I would like to first say people in the United States are supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty. The court cases concerning Ralph Baker are very much still open.
The property in question on South Elliot Street in Brooklyn that belongs to Ralph Baker, the blind African American Photographer has been in his possession since the mid nineties. When someone took a 600,000 $ mortgage out on the building , he realized something was wrong. This is when he went to the Brooklyn District Attorney to ask for help. The person who claimed to own the South Eliot Property is named Ralph W. Baker JR. The actual title to the property only has the name "Ralph Baker" on it. The real Ralph Baker, who is sitting in Rikers, unable to continue his ongoing Civil Cases was seriously dismayed when they brought Ralph W. Baker Jr. into court to question him about the South Elliot Property yet the courts did not asked him to prove his identity which could of easily been done by looking into his Social Security Card.
The Real Ralph Baker was able to legally remove the mortgage from his property in March 2012, unfortunately he was arrested in April due to his other property in Question , 140 Metropolitan Ave, Brooklyn. The last owner of this building passed away 15 or so years ago. The Real Ralph Baker has been managing and making upgrades to this building since the mid 90's. He legally holds a quiet title to this building. The person who had him arrested holds a confirmatory deed, yet these can not be legally obtained except by the previous owner, who has been dead long before this.
The Real Ralph Baker's problem also is that the courts assigned him a criminal lawyer "Doug Appel" whom admitted that terms like "Quit Title*" and "Confirmatory Deed*" were new to him.
Doug also felt that because Ralph is upset with him concerning him getting sent to a mental ward for 6 or so months that he can't represent Ralph and that he will ask the judge to assign him a new lawyer. This will definitely slow things down but in the end Ralph will hopefully be in a better position.
The Real Ralph Baker needs a Real Estate Lawyer
note: these notes have been made after a couple of brief conversations with the Real Ralph Baker and after briefly looking over the court papers. More fleshing out will be done in the near future. These thoughts may not be 100 % accurate, but due to the fact that Ralph's time is running out, I felt it was important to post them.
quiet title action n. a lawsuit to establish a party's title to real property against anyone and everyone, and thus "quiet" any challenges or claims to the title. Such a suit usually arises when there is some question about clear title, there exists some recorded problem (such as an old lease or failure to clear title after payment of a mortgage), an error in description which casts doubt on the amount of property owned, or an easement used for years without a recorded description. An action for quiet title requires description of the property to be "quieted," naming as defendants anyone who might have an interest (including descendants---known or unknown---of prior owners), and the factual and legal basis for the claim of title. Notice must be given to all potentially interested parties, including known and unknown, by publication. If the court is convinced title is in the plaintiff (the plaintiff owns the title), a quiet title judgment will be granted which can be recorded and thus provide legal "good title." Quiet title actions are a common example of "friendly" lawsuits in which often there is no opposition.
*CONFIRMATORY DEEDS
suck, squeeze ,burn, spit---jet engine
I've been in touch with him off and on all these years and I've always been interested in his different land and real estate ventures.
I would like to first say people in the United States are supposed to be considered innocent until proven guilty. The court cases concerning Ralph Baker are very much still open.
The property in question on South Elliot Street in Brooklyn that belongs to Ralph Baker, the blind African American Photographer has been in his possession since the mid nineties. When someone took a 600,000 $ mortgage out on the building , he realized something was wrong. This is when he went to the Brooklyn District Attorney to ask for help. The person who claimed to own the South Eliot Property is named Ralph W. Baker JR. The actual title to the property only has the name "Ralph Baker" on it. The real Ralph Baker, who is sitting in Rikers, unable to continue his ongoing Civil Cases was seriously dismayed when they brought Ralph W. Baker Jr. into court to question him about the South Elliot Property yet the courts did not asked him to prove his identity which could of easily been done by looking into his Social Security Card.
The Real Ralph Baker was able to legally remove the mortgage from his property in March 2012, unfortunately he was arrested in April due to his other property in Question , 140 Metropolitan Ave, Brooklyn. The last owner of this building passed away 15 or so years ago. The Real Ralph Baker has been managing and making upgrades to this building since the mid 90's. He legally holds a quiet title to this building. The person who had him arrested holds a confirmatory deed, yet these can not be legally obtained except by the previous owner, who has been dead long before this.
The Real Ralph Baker's problem also is that the courts assigned him a criminal lawyer "Doug Appel" whom admitted that terms like "Quit Title*" and "Confirmatory Deed*" were new to him.
Doug also felt that because Ralph is upset with him concerning him getting sent to a mental ward for 6 or so months that he can't represent Ralph and that he will ask the judge to assign him a new lawyer. This will definitely slow things down but in the end Ralph will hopefully be in a better position.
The Real Ralph Baker needs a Real Estate Lawyer
note: these notes have been made after a couple of brief conversations with the Real Ralph Baker and after briefly looking over the court papers. More fleshing out will be done in the near future. These thoughts may not be 100 % accurate, but due to the fact that Ralph's time is running out, I felt it was important to post them.
quiet title action n. a lawsuit to establish a party's title to real property against anyone and everyone, and thus "quiet" any challenges or claims to the title. Such a suit usually arises when there is some question about clear title, there exists some recorded problem (such as an old lease or failure to clear title after payment of a mortgage), an error in description which casts doubt on the amount of property owned, or an easement used for years without a recorded description. An action for quiet title requires description of the property to be "quieted," naming as defendants anyone who might have an interest (including descendants---known or unknown---of prior owners), and the factual and legal basis for the claim of title. Notice must be given to all potentially interested parties, including known and unknown, by publication. If the court is convinced title is in the plaintiff (the plaintiff owns the title), a quiet title judgment will be granted which can be recorded and thus provide legal "good title." Quiet title actions are a common example of "friendly" lawsuits in which often there is no opposition.
*CONFIRMATORY DEEDS
Confirmatory deed is a type of deed, which is used to correct certain defects in record title. It is important to know that the purpose of a confirmatory deed is not to give or create a new title but simply to "perfect the evidence of a title created long before". "A deed stating that it is given to replace a certain deed of the same tenor is merely confirmatory, and does not pass a title to a part of land which one of the grantors has acquired after the execution of the lost deed and before the execution of the confirmatory one".
Confirmatory deeds may be used to correct the deeds to the present titleholders as well as prior defects in record title. See Bon V. Graves, 104 N.E. 2d 1023 (1914), which held that a "confirmatory deed, properly sealed and declaring that an earlier deed between the same parties was also sealed, obviated the defect in the title arising from lack of seal on the earlier deed".
When a confirmatory deed is used to correct a title defect in the deed to the original grantee, who had already conveyed the property to third parties, the confirmatory deed should run to the original grantee "and to those persons claiming by, through or under him by instruments of record". It should be dated "as of" the date of the original conveyance, contain a reference to the deed being confirmed and a statement that it is given to confirm the earlier deed.
suck, squeeze ,burn, spit---jet engine
Tuesday, October 2, 2012
Ralph's bad Real Estate Press
18 People Arrested For Real Estate Fraud In Brooklyn
March 28, 2011 2:59 PM
NEW YORK (CBSNewYork) – The shattered real estate market has apparently created opportunities for scam artists.
Eighteen people – including a former pastor – have been arrested and charged with real estate crimes including reverse mortgage scams, loan modification and deed theft.
Brooklyn District Attorney Joe Hynes said the defendants preyed on Brooklyn homeowners and people attempting to buy homes.
WCBS 880′s Irene Cornell reports on the real estate fraud
Download: mar28-cornell-brooklyn.mp3
WCBS 880′s Irene Cornell reports investigators quickly learned the 61-year-old didn’t own the Brownstone. Hynes said the property was actually owned by another man named Ralph Baker.
The alleged phony Ralph Baker was arrested.
Sen. Charles Schumer describes the scheme one of the more “sleazy” types of crimes, 1010 WINS’ Juliet Papa reports Download: scam-3papa-w40-soc-afarr.mp3
Hynes said his investigators will not stop until the real estate thieves stop and he gave Senator Charles Schumer the credit for getting the funds to support his investigative unit.
“There is a new sheriff in town and you’d better watch it,” said Schumer.
The Mortgage Fraud and Real Estate Crimes Unit has launched 250 investigations since 2009 and have prosecuted 40 cases.
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/03/28/18-arrested-for-real-estate-fraud-in-brooklyn/
photography show
SIGHT UNSEEN
International Photography by Blind Artists
May 02, 2009 - August 29, 2009
Curated by Douglas McCulloh
http://138.23.124.165/exhibitions/sightunseen/exh_bio_11.lasso
Ralph Baker is a blind street photographer in New York City. Baker shoots, prints, and sells small photographs at public events for immediate money. "Million Man March. That was a fun one. The Million Woman March was also fun. Street parties are fun. Some parades. St. Paddy's Day parade is great. Thanksgiving Day parade is good, too. Fourth of July..." Locations that draw crowds appear as repeated backdrops: Times Square, the Christmas tree at Rockefeller Center, Central Park.
He shrugs off questions about photography by a blind person. "Yeah, that doesn't make a difference... My camera can see."
Baker began his street shooting in 1966, and has operated ever since without required New York City vendor permits. Baker considers himself an artist. "I'm compelled to take pictures as a photographer... it's not a want." But the police tend view him as an unlicensed general vendor. The resulting periodic trouble with the NYPD leads to his most frequent self-description: "blind common criminal street photographer."
Every single image in this exhibition is one of the photographer's "failures." These are images that people did not want or buy. In a street-based photo economy, a sale equals success; these are washouts, rejects, losers. This is a prime reason these images are of interest. The world is full of perfect, pointless images. These are glorious failures shot by someone who cannot see. In fact, Baker's process of street sales is a culling regimen. Successes, that is to say images that meet with hollow, denatured formal expectations, vanish into someone's life. Failures-read: the unexpected, the oddly revealing-remain in the artist's trove.
Flipping through piles of Baker's collected images, therefore, brings a basic photo dichotomy into high relief. Somewhere in the frame are subjects enacting what image socialization has pounded into them-stand, strike a pose, present a gaze, remain embalmed until the shutter falls. The camera implacably returns their gaze. All seems well. But leaking in from every edge is the unkempt world of lively happenstance. Unbeknownst to the subjects, this camera is blind. Sighted photographers-most especially professionals-know to keep the real world out. Ralph Baker cannot, so the photographs crawl with life.
Baker was interviewed in 2005 by journalist Raphie Frank.
How do you know when you've taken a good shot or not? Well, I only go places where there's a good picture. A person is only part of a picture. The picture is a location or an activity. The picture is a spot.
The pictures that you take, do your subjects know the picture is being taken by someone who can't see them? No. Few people find out that I don't see them.
How do you get that one over? I ask them to stand at the line (on the ground) and smile. Then I press the button and print. Then I collect the twenty.
And they seem to like the pictures? I only do special photos, commemorative photos of locations, times and events. The desire for the photo is already there.
International Photography by Blind Artists
May 02, 2009 - August 29, 2009
Curated by Douglas McCulloh
http://138.23.124.165/exhibitions/sightunseen/exh_bio_11.lasso
Ralph Baker is a blind street photographer in New York City. Baker shoots, prints, and sells small photographs at public events for immediate money. "Million Man March. That was a fun one. The Million Woman March was also fun. Street parties are fun. Some parades. St. Paddy's Day parade is great. Thanksgiving Day parade is good, too. Fourth of July..." Locations that draw crowds appear as repeated backdrops: Times Square, the Christmas tree at Rockefeller Center, Central Park.
He shrugs off questions about photography by a blind person. "Yeah, that doesn't make a difference... My camera can see."
Baker began his street shooting in 1966, and has operated ever since without required New York City vendor permits. Baker considers himself an artist. "I'm compelled to take pictures as a photographer... it's not a want." But the police tend view him as an unlicensed general vendor. The resulting periodic trouble with the NYPD leads to his most frequent self-description: "blind common criminal street photographer."
Every single image in this exhibition is one of the photographer's "failures." These are images that people did not want or buy. In a street-based photo economy, a sale equals success; these are washouts, rejects, losers. This is a prime reason these images are of interest. The world is full of perfect, pointless images. These are glorious failures shot by someone who cannot see. In fact, Baker's process of street sales is a culling regimen. Successes, that is to say images that meet with hollow, denatured formal expectations, vanish into someone's life. Failures-read: the unexpected, the oddly revealing-remain in the artist's trove.
Flipping through piles of Baker's collected images, therefore, brings a basic photo dichotomy into high relief. Somewhere in the frame are subjects enacting what image socialization has pounded into them-stand, strike a pose, present a gaze, remain embalmed until the shutter falls. The camera implacably returns their gaze. All seems well. But leaking in from every edge is the unkempt world of lively happenstance. Unbeknownst to the subjects, this camera is blind. Sighted photographers-most especially professionals-know to keep the real world out. Ralph Baker cannot, so the photographs crawl with life.
Baker was interviewed in 2005 by journalist Raphie Frank.
How do you know when you've taken a good shot or not? Well, I only go places where there's a good picture. A person is only part of a picture. The picture is a location or an activity. The picture is a spot.
The pictures that you take, do your subjects know the picture is being taken by someone who can't see them? No. Few people find out that I don't see them.
How do you get that one over? I ask them to stand at the line (on the ground) and smile. Then I press the button and print. Then I collect the twenty.
And they seem to like the pictures? I only do special photos, commemorative photos of locations, times and events. The desire for the photo is already there.
Raphie Frank Interviews Ralph Baker in Arts & Entertainment on September 10, 2005
Ralph Baker, (refusing to be) Blind Photographer
There
is no other way to put it. Ralph Baker, street photographer, is simply
not your average kind of guy. He lives in what he calls his "spaceship,"
a green-housed, alternative, post-apocalypticish living space wedged
snugly between two Williamsburg residential/commercial buildings.
Ladders connect "floors" together. There's the gadget filled "engine
room" in the basement, his winter-proofed, multi-down-comforter-laced
bedroom, and a cozy combination living room/kitchen area that tops the
three-story iron-grated assemblage. Con-Ed supplies his gas and Verizon
supplies his phone service.I have known Ralph for five years now. We lived in the same building back in 2000/2001 and he would often wander by my loft - a loft he helped build - and show me with obvious relish his new digital cameras, his state of the art portable printers and - squinting through thick lensed glasses - the fruits of his trade, 8 x 11 or 5 x 7 pictures of nostalgically-frozen smiling tourists at Rockefeller Center or Times Square.
But it's a bit strange these days to talk to Ralph. He won't meet your gaze, even as he'll meet your mind, and he alternates, as he always did, between smart-assed, but good natured, cynicism and almost delusionally optimistic idealism. Always ready with a smile, possessed of an almost zen-like placidity, one might be forgiven for thinking Ralph crazy.
Afterall, at least until recently, Ralph has continued to ply his street photography trade although the NYPD has arrested him, by his own estimation, in excess of 100 times since 1966. Afterall, five years subsequent to our first meeting, this photographer's glasses are put aside. He doesn't need them anymore. The first time he'll know what I have written about him will be tomorrow or the day after when somebody reads it to him. Because, afterall, Ralph is now almost completely blind and insane enough, through pride, hope, optimism, idealism or self-love - choose any or all of the above - to think he can still live his life like a man who sees.
You're a street photographer, but you're legally blind...
Yeah, that doesn't make a difference though. My camera can see.
How do you know when you've taken a good shot or not?
Well, I only go places where there's a good picture. A person is only part of a picture. The picture is a location or an activity. The picture is a spot.
The pictures that you take, do your subjects know the picture is being taken by someone who can't see them?
No. Few people find out that I don't see them.
How do you get that one over?
I ask them to stand at the line [on the ground] and smile. Then I press the button and print. Then I collect the twenty.
And they seem to like the pictures?
I only do special photos, commemorative photos of locations times and events. The desire for the photo is already there.
What's your history with photography?
When I was little my mother gave me a polaroid camera and the film cost money so I had to sell pictures to get money to buy more film. And I did. And since then I've been doing pictures, pictures for money all over the country, especially in New York, of historical or what I see as important events.
Such as?
Million Man March. That was a fun one. The Million Woman March was also fun. Street parties are fun. Some parades. St. Patties day parade is great. Thanksgiving Day parade is good too. Fourth of July...
How did losing your sight impact your livelihood?
I messed up a few pictures. When I first went blind, I couldn't tell I was blind, but I wasn't getting the full picture. I'd cut off a person and then I'd be like, "Oh, I didn't see them." So I switched eyes because one eye, it was gone. I could find stuff but I couldn't identify anything.
What's the problem?
My retina is dying. A kind of glaucoma. Actually two types combined, so I have almost no sight.
What do you see?
I see patches of light. Movements kind of. Shadows not so much. The value is light. Light to dark. The lighter it is, the better I see it, the darker it is and it, well, it doesn't really matter as much.
What do you see of me right now?
Of you? Your [silver] tape recorder. In your hand on your knee.
Do you see my face at all?
No. I barely see the recorder. I can see it because it's a brighter object. I have what's called scanner vision. If you can scan it, you can see it.
[Interviewer holds hand four inches from Ralph's face]
Can you see my hand?
No.
So, how can you take pictures? I'm not sure I get this...
Well [speading hands out wide]. My camera sees from here to here. It sees in 180 [degrees]. And I only think in a 45. So everything in the 45 fits into 180.
You haven't been taking pictures for about a year. Why is that? Your failing sight?
The New York City Police Department has classified me, or actually my activities on the street... they have a new classification called "terrorist". It means you're subject to having the Federal Marshalls and the CIA come to your house and all those such things, as well as hold you for questioning for hours on end. After being subject to that kind of treatment as a possible something...
You've been arrested as a possible terrorist?
I've been detained to be questioned by the CIA for about six hours at City Hall - it was actually before 9/11. I've been detained in the subway station and questioned by people that are called to question people like me. And then I was arrested in a violent manner, my shoulders were injured, and I was treated as if I were being violent and the next thing is not to do it. So I'm not doing it.
Because you don't want to or because you feel that you can't?
I'm compelled to take pictures as a photographer, so it's not a want. It's a restraint. I don't deserve the kind of violence that the police department has been delivering.
How long have you been doing street photography?
Since 1966.
And about how many times would you say you've been arrested?
Oh, it's over a hundred. There are different types of arrest. There are documented arrests. That's 100 Centre Street. Then there are ticketed arrests, which is 346 Broadway. And then there are apprehended and held until you see the judge arrests, which is community court at some street and 54th street. And then there are the times they pick you up and bring you to God's country and drop you off without giving you a ticket. Or they'll take your property and you can go find your receipt for it at the precinct. If you combine all of those, then it's actually well over 100 times I've been arrested since 1966. There's a year or two every now and then when I don't get arrested because I lay around and do nothing.
I understand you've fought this in court. Have you received any judgements in your favor?
No, not the City. They gave me a few dollars once and told me to hire a lawyer.
But the Federal Court, about five years ago, ruled that I cannot be treated as an unlicensed general vendor, that I have to be treated at least like an artist. And to treat me like an unlicensed general vendor was unlawful, unenforceable and unconstitutional. However, the judge stopped short of condemning the City and gave them an alternative that was to leave me alone and treat me like a vendor.
What effect did that have?
None. Less than none.
Things didn't get better even for a while?
No, They got absolutely worse. I got arrested on sight. More than before. But [laughing] they'd call me by name now and arrest me.
So, wait, let me get this right, they know you by name, you've been doing this for thirty years and they are holding you as a potential terrorist?
Well, it's police policy treatment. Everyone is treated the same and the new level of treatment is that everybody's under suspicion. And I do walk around with the camera and I do walk around with a bag or a box or...
So even though they know you by name and you've been doing this for thirty years...
Well the new guys don't know me, and they're the ones that knock me to the ground and put a gun to me and are like "Get him! Get him! Get him!". The old guys just kind of laugh at it.
The old cops?
Right.
Do you have any friends out there. You know, cops who say, "Gee, Ralph I'm sorry this is happening to you."?
I think most of them are dead now. I'm almost 60.
Ralph, I have to ask you. Do you think race has played a role in any of this?
I don't know. No, I don't think so. I would have to say no. This is a very special thing. Just mine.
In the last year you've been at both Bellevue and Rikers Island. Would you be willing to talk about that?
Bellevue is a nice place. I had a doctor, two social workers and a nurse.
How did you end up there?
Well, on my record it says mentally insane or criminally insane. It says something about that. From my initial investigations with the police, it says something about that I am dangerous to the public.
How so? What are they basing this on?
It's just based on the record.
Have you ever hurt anyone?
I've never been involved in any violent acts at all. On record or off record.
But you are deemed to be a violent person.
Violent and crazy, yes.
What do you attribute that to?
The policy of the police department is to exaggerate charges so that something sticks and the policy of the justice system is to negotiate. And because of that the police come up with as many charges as they can come up with.
How did you end up at Bellevue?
I was supposed to be sent to the hospital and they locked me up in jail. So then they saw on the record that I was a crazy individual, so then they sent me to Bellevue. I was there about 30 days. They deemed that I was safe to the public and not a danger to myself. And that I was impossible to medicate.
Why?
Because I refused to participate. I didn't feel it was necessary.
What were they trying to fix?
Paranoid schizophrenic. Bipolar. Grandiose complex and some other stuff.
Do you see these things in yourself?
I have been in contact with all these things, but I've never categorized myself that way. But all of these chemical imbalances have been attributed to some of the greatest people alive, so I don't understand any need for medication.
Did they know that you're blind?
They found out.
Do you think that might contribute to the perception that you're crazy? I mean, you look at people and you don't see them. But they don't know that. So that could lead to...
Well, if you're a policeman and you're coming up to bother me, well, you shouldn't be coming up to bother me in the first place.
Okay Ralph, but if you don't make eye contact and I'm a police officer, and I don't know that you're blind, I'm going to judge that in a different way than if I do know.
Good, but your first judgement should have been to leave me alone and your second judgement should have been to get me help.
How did you end up on Rikers Island
After Bellevue transferred me, then the court case couldn't be settled, and the sentence was time served, but I wouldn't plead guilty.
What was the charge?
Attempted menacing.
Now what were you doing that they were calling menacing?
Same as usual. Nothing. I was pointed out by McCarren Park, walking down the street and next thing I hear is somebody scream "My kids! My kids!" and four or five cops jumped me.
Why do you think you were perceived as a menace?
The whole thing happened so fast. I never got to ask anybody.
Yeah, that doesn't make a difference though. My camera can see.
How do you know when you've taken a good shot or not?
Well, I only go places where there's a good picture. A person is only part of a picture. The picture is a location or an activity. The picture is a spot.
The pictures that you take, do your subjects know the picture is being taken by someone who can't see them?
No. Few people find out that I don't see them.
How do you get that one over?
I ask them to stand at the line [on the ground] and smile. Then I press the button and print. Then I collect the twenty.
And they seem to like the pictures?
I only do special photos, commemorative photos of locations times and events. The desire for the photo is already there.
What's your history with photography?
When I was little my mother gave me a polaroid camera and the film cost money so I had to sell pictures to get money to buy more film. And I did. And since then I've been doing pictures, pictures for money all over the country, especially in New York, of historical or what I see as important events.
Such as?
Million Man March. That was a fun one. The Million Woman March was also fun. Street parties are fun. Some parades. St. Patties day parade is great. Thanksgiving Day parade is good too. Fourth of July...
How did losing your sight impact your livelihood?
I messed up a few pictures. When I first went blind, I couldn't tell I was blind, but I wasn't getting the full picture. I'd cut off a person and then I'd be like, "Oh, I didn't see them." So I switched eyes because one eye, it was gone. I could find stuff but I couldn't identify anything.
What's the problem?
My retina is dying. A kind of glaucoma. Actually two types combined, so I have almost no sight.
What do you see?
I see patches of light. Movements kind of. Shadows not so much. The value is light. Light to dark. The lighter it is, the better I see it, the darker it is and it, well, it doesn't really matter as much.
What do you see of me right now?
Of you? Your [silver] tape recorder. In your hand on your knee.
Do you see my face at all?
No. I barely see the recorder. I can see it because it's a brighter object. I have what's called scanner vision. If you can scan it, you can see it.
[Interviewer holds hand four inches from Ralph's face]
Can you see my hand?
No.
So, how can you take pictures? I'm not sure I get this...
Well [speading hands out wide]. My camera sees from here to here. It sees in 180 [degrees]. And I only think in a 45. So everything in the 45 fits into 180.
You haven't been taking pictures for about a year. Why is that? Your failing sight?
The New York City Police Department has classified me, or actually my activities on the street... they have a new classification called "terrorist". It means you're subject to having the Federal Marshalls and the CIA come to your house and all those such things, as well as hold you for questioning for hours on end. After being subject to that kind of treatment as a possible something...
You've been arrested as a possible terrorist?
I've been detained to be questioned by the CIA for about six hours at City Hall - it was actually before 9/11. I've been detained in the subway station and questioned by people that are called to question people like me. And then I was arrested in a violent manner, my shoulders were injured, and I was treated as if I were being violent and the next thing is not to do it. So I'm not doing it.
Because you don't want to or because you feel that you can't?
I'm compelled to take pictures as a photographer, so it's not a want. It's a restraint. I don't deserve the kind of violence that the police department has been delivering.
How long have you been doing street photography?
Since 1966.
And about how many times would you say you've been arrested?
Oh, it's over a hundred. There are different types of arrest. There are documented arrests. That's 100 Centre Street. Then there are ticketed arrests, which is 346 Broadway. And then there are apprehended and held until you see the judge arrests, which is community court at some street and 54th street. And then there are the times they pick you up and bring you to God's country and drop you off without giving you a ticket. Or they'll take your property and you can go find your receipt for it at the precinct. If you combine all of those, then it's actually well over 100 times I've been arrested since 1966. There's a year or two every now and then when I don't get arrested because I lay around and do nothing.
I understand you've fought this in court. Have you received any judgements in your favor?
No, not the City. They gave me a few dollars once and told me to hire a lawyer.
But the Federal Court, about five years ago, ruled that I cannot be treated as an unlicensed general vendor, that I have to be treated at least like an artist. And to treat me like an unlicensed general vendor was unlawful, unenforceable and unconstitutional. However, the judge stopped short of condemning the City and gave them an alternative that was to leave me alone and treat me like a vendor.
What effect did that have?
None. Less than none.
Things didn't get better even for a while?
No, They got absolutely worse. I got arrested on sight. More than before. But [laughing] they'd call me by name now and arrest me.
So, wait, let me get this right, they know you by name, you've been doing this for thirty years and they are holding you as a potential terrorist?
Well, it's police policy treatment. Everyone is treated the same and the new level of treatment is that everybody's under suspicion. And I do walk around with the camera and I do walk around with a bag or a box or...
So even though they know you by name and you've been doing this for thirty years...
Well the new guys don't know me, and they're the ones that knock me to the ground and put a gun to me and are like "Get him! Get him! Get him!". The old guys just kind of laugh at it.
The old cops?
Right.
Do you have any friends out there. You know, cops who say, "Gee, Ralph I'm sorry this is happening to you."?
I think most of them are dead now. I'm almost 60.
Ralph, I have to ask you. Do you think race has played a role in any of this?
I don't know. No, I don't think so. I would have to say no. This is a very special thing. Just mine.
In the last year you've been at both Bellevue and Rikers Island. Would you be willing to talk about that?
Bellevue is a nice place. I had a doctor, two social workers and a nurse.
How did you end up there?
Well, on my record it says mentally insane or criminally insane. It says something about that. From my initial investigations with the police, it says something about that I am dangerous to the public.
How so? What are they basing this on?
It's just based on the record.
Have you ever hurt anyone?
I've never been involved in any violent acts at all. On record or off record.
But you are deemed to be a violent person.
Violent and crazy, yes.
What do you attribute that to?
The policy of the police department is to exaggerate charges so that something sticks and the policy of the justice system is to negotiate. And because of that the police come up with as many charges as they can come up with.
How did you end up at Bellevue?
I was supposed to be sent to the hospital and they locked me up in jail. So then they saw on the record that I was a crazy individual, so then they sent me to Bellevue. I was there about 30 days. They deemed that I was safe to the public and not a danger to myself. And that I was impossible to medicate.
Why?
Because I refused to participate. I didn't feel it was necessary.
What were they trying to fix?
Paranoid schizophrenic. Bipolar. Grandiose complex and some other stuff.
Do you see these things in yourself?
I have been in contact with all these things, but I've never categorized myself that way. But all of these chemical imbalances have been attributed to some of the greatest people alive, so I don't understand any need for medication.
Did they know that you're blind?
They found out.
Do you think that might contribute to the perception that you're crazy? I mean, you look at people and you don't see them. But they don't know that. So that could lead to...
Well, if you're a policeman and you're coming up to bother me, well, you shouldn't be coming up to bother me in the first place.
Okay Ralph, but if you don't make eye contact and I'm a police officer, and I don't know that you're blind, I'm going to judge that in a different way than if I do know.
Good, but your first judgement should have been to leave me alone and your second judgement should have been to get me help.
How did you end up on Rikers Island
After Bellevue transferred me, then the court case couldn't be settled, and the sentence was time served, but I wouldn't plead guilty.
What was the charge?
Attempted menacing.
Now what were you doing that they were calling menacing?
Same as usual. Nothing. I was pointed out by McCarren Park, walking down the street and next thing I hear is somebody scream "My kids! My kids!" and four or five cops jumped me.
Why do you think you were perceived as a menace?
The whole thing happened so fast. I never got to ask anybody.
Contact the author of this article or email tips@gothamist.com with further questions, comments or tips.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)